Sergey Mikheev broadcast. Sergey Mikheev. Personal life of Sergei Mikheev
Sergey Mikheev is a Russian political scientist, blogger, journalist, host of the socio-political program “Iron Logic”, guest of the “Duel” program, “political patriot” of the Russian Federation, supporter of the idea of the “Russian world”.
Sergei Aleksandrovich Mikheev is a native Muscovite. He was born in May 1967 into an intelligent family.
After graduating from school, Mikheev went to the Izolyator plant. He didn’t stay here long because he was called up for military service. Two years after demobilization, Sergei got a job at the Air Force Engineering Academy named after N. E. Zhukovsky. Here the young man worked for 7 years.
In 1994, Sergei Mikheev left the academy due to his admission to Moscow State University. He chose one of the most prestigious and interesting faculties - philosophy. But this choice was not dictated by fashion or prestige, but by a keen interest in science. The young man’s greatest curiosity was related to political science, to which he devoted a lot of time and effort.
Career
In his third year, in 1997, the young political scientist got a part-time job at the University’s Regional Policy Laboratory. Over the course of a year, he managed to prove himself in such a way that he was accepted into the ranks of experts at the Russian Center for Political Current Affairs in Russia. But here Mikheev stayed until 2001. He left the Center due to ideological differences with its director Igor Bunin.
The same year in the career of a political scientist was marked by a breakthrough to resounding success. Mikheev was hired as a political expert on the popular website Politkom.ru. The public interested in politics immediately noticed a bright expert whose assessments were admired for their accuracy, objectivity and emotionality. Sergei Alexandrovich now has a circle of admirers.
Since 2004, the political scientist has changed his place of work. He was admitted to the Center for Political Technologies, established under the CIS Department. A year later, Mikheev became deputy general director and significantly expanded the range of his activities.
Soon, the expert and political scientist becomes director of the Institute of Caspian Cooperation. The website of this organization is a media aggregator that collects information from various websites dedicated to the region. And Sergei Mikheev becomes an ITAR-TASS expert.
From 2011 to 2013, he worked as director of the Center for Political Conjuncture, where he recently began working as an expert.
In the fall of next year, on the initiative of Lithuania, after a speech by a political scientist at a conference in Vilnius, Mikheev was included in the list of desiderata (undesirable persons) who are prohibited from entering the EU countries because of his position on the crisis that occurred in Ukraine.
Mikheev was not informed of this procedure and was arrested when he tried to legally enter Finland. The Russian had to spend several hours in a prison cell. But Sergei Alexandrovich was not embarrassed by such punishment. He did not abandon his position and did not change his views. The political scientist believes that the truth is more valuable than a vacation in Rome or Paris.
The biography of Sergei Mikheev also includes his bright performances on television talk shows, where he is often invited. Mikheev is a frequent guest on programs. And since December 2015, the expert tried his hand at the role of host of the socio-political program “Iron Logic,” which is broadcast on Vesti-FM radio. At first, Alla Volokhina was his co-host, and later she was replaced by Sergei Korneevsky.
After the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, Sergei Mikheev was elected head of the Expert Advisory Council under the head of the Republic of Crimea.
Sergey Mikheev, "Evening with Vladimir Solovyov" Since 2016, the political scientist began appearing on Vladimir Solovyov’s analytical talk show “Duel.” The essence of the program was a meeting between two opponents, who expressed their points of view in the first round and then answered questions from specialists and the TV presenter. At the end of the program, an SMS voting takes place among viewers, based on the results of which the winner of the episode is selected.
Sergei Mikheev participated in a program on relations between Russia and Europe, where his opponent was a politician. The political scientist discussed a similar topic with. In an episode dedicated to the situation in Donbass, Sergei spoke out against his Ukrainian colleague Vyacheslav Kovtun and received a record 94% of audience votes. On the air of the talk show, Mikheev also discussed with Yakub Koreyba, Yuri Pivovarov,. The topics discussed on air had to do with Russian foreign policy and the issue of liberalization of the country.
Today the name of this man is familiar to everyone who is at least somewhat interested in politics. The main reason for Sergei Alexandrovich’s success is his deep awareness of issues of domestic and foreign policy, as well as straightforwardness. Most often, Western and American politicians come under fire from expert criticism. And recently, he has been subjecting the political elite of neighboring Ukraine to sharp obstruction.
Personal life
Unfortunately, the personal life of Sergei Mikheev is hidden from prying eyes. The political scientist believes that he is not a representative of show business or a pop star, so he keeps family affairs secret from the idle public. But it is known that Mikheev has a wife and three children. By religion, Sergei Alexandrovich considers himself an Orthodox Christian.
Sergey Mikheev now
Sergei Mikheev’s main place of work remains the Vesti FM radio. On the Tsargrad TV website, the political scientist also hosts the analytical program “Results of the Week.” On the air of the program, Sergei Mikheev examined in detail the situation surrounding the Russian presidential elections, predicting a high turnout and victory for the current head of state. In the analytical program, the author covers issues related to innovations in the country’s economy and future robotization.
In addition to participating in television and radio projects, Sergei Mikheev runs his own website, on the pages of which he publishes videos of the “Iron Logic” program, where he examines topical topics on a weekly basis. In 2018, they became issues of interaction between Russia and the West, poisoning, loudly from the United States. An equally interesting discussion was the release of a program against Russia during the Olympic Games. According to the political scientist, the West has exhausted all methods in the fight against Russia and has taken a wait-and-see attitude.
Some of the episodes of Iron Logic touched on the topic of elections and high ratings. Now the main issue of the program is the war in Syria. Mikheev examines from a political science point of view the participation of Russian troops in the military conflict, the nuances of the participation of the US Army in launching military strikes on the eastern state, as well as the withdrawal from the nuclear deal with Iran.
Projects
- 2001 – “Politkom.ru”
- 2015 – “Iron Logic”
- 2016 – “Duel”
- 2017 – “Mikheev. Results"
He is one of the brightest and most emotional speakers on political talk shows on federal channels of Russian TV, ready to defend the national interests and honor of his native country not only through logic, the results of opinion polls, statistical data and his own erudition, but also with the help of his fists. For example, Polish journalist Tomas Maciejczuk once fell under his hot hand.
However, some media outlets classify him as one of the “mercenaries of the times” and the “new preachers of hatred,” describing such talk shows as debates during which a dozen “experts” attack and shout at a person who dares to take a position that does not coincide with the “current general line” and express an alternative point of view.
early years
The future expert in political science was born on May 28, 1967 in an ordinary Moscow family. There is no information about his childhood, parents and roots in the public domain - he does not like to share details of his personal life with journalists, preferring not to make it public. 
It is known that as a child he wanted to become a pilot, and after school he went to work at the Izolyator plant near Moscow, from where he left the army a year later. Sergei did not specify where he served in any of the interviews.
After being demobilized in 1987, he got a job as a laboratory assistant at the Air Force Engineering Academy. prof. N. Zhukovsky. Seven years later, he entered Moscow State University in the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Philosophy.
Career Development
In the 3rd year of study, in 1997, in parallel with studying the theory of politics, political forecasting, psychology, conflictology and other political processes and sciences, Mikheev became an employee of the university Laboratory of Regional Policy. In addition, he carried out orders from various political forces, including the socio-political association “Congress of Russian Communities”, which was close to him for its patriotic program. 
During the year of work in the Laboratory, the capable student participated in studies of regional political regimes, systems, regional structures, managed to show his best side, and in 1998 was accepted into the ranks of experts of the private company “Center for Political Conjuncture of Russia” (CPKR), which he headed Alexey Alexandrovich Chesnakov.
In this organization, previously created by students from Mikheev’s faculty together with representatives of the Russian-American University and the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, for three years he successfully analyzed political processes, monitored the media, and other issues. In particular, in 1999, TsPKR specialists provided expert and analytical support during the State Duma elections of the Unity political movement, on the basis of which the United Russia party was later formed.
In 1999, he graduated from university and began collaborating with the independent foundation Center for Political Technologies (CPT), the main competitor of the Center for Political Technologies. At that time, CPT advised large clients, including Norilsk Nickel, YUKOS, Transneft, and needed personnel. In 2001, the young specialist, who had experience working as a political strategist at the TsPKR, was offered the position of leading expert at the TsPT Foundation.
In the same year, Sergei Mikheev became a political observer and one of the main authors of publications on the information website Politkom.ru, launched by the General Director of the TsPT Foundation, Igor Mikhailovich Bunin. Successfully moving up the career ladder, in 2004 he headed the CIS Countries Department at the TsPT, and a year later received the post of Deputy General Director of the Fund. However, soon due to ideological differences with Bunin, he left the TsPT.
Soon he became the head of the non-profit partnership “Institute of Caspian Cooperation”, which specialized in creating databases, unified registers and other information resources. In addition, a bright researcher of the world of politics was invited to the position of political expert at the central news agency of the Russian Federation “ITAR-TASS”.
During the period 2011-2013. he returned as director to the Center for Political Conjuncture, where he began his expert work under the leadership of Chesnakov.
After the annexation of Crimea, the political scientist became the head of the Expert Advisory Council under the Head of the Republic, created to analyze the socio-political situation on the peninsula, as well as the chairman of the supervisory board of the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization “Expert Group “Crimean Project””.
In 2014, on the initiative of Lithuania, Sergei Mikheev was banned from entering EU countries.
The political consultant was a frequent guest on political talk shows on TV, in particular, the program “Evening with Vladimir Solovyov” on the Russia 1 channel, actively defended the interests of the Russian Federation, criticized the government of Western countries, the conflict with Ukraine, and the actions of the United States. Against the background of the aggravated foreign policy situation, his position turned out to be especially in demand.
In 2015, he became the host of the radio program “Iron Logic” on Vesti FM, and at the same time, a political commentator for the radically conservative Internet channel Tsargrad TV. Since 2017, he has hosted the program “Mikheev. Results,” where he spoke on the most pressing topics of the week, made an assessment of events, and made forecasts for a particular situation.
Personal life of Sergei Mikheev
The political scientist is married. He met his wife, a native of Feodosia Larisa (nee Sirotinina), while studying at the Faculty of Philosophy at Moscow State University. She later left her career in favor of housekeeping and raising children. According to unofficial information, the couple has three. It is known that the son, born in 2000, is named Egor. 
When asked by journalists about his hobbies, the political scientist said that he had previously been involved in martial arts, karate, and participated in hang gliding competitions that were held near Koktebel on Mount Klementyev.
Mikheev is an Orthodox Christian.
For work, he visited many European countries, the USA, Iran, China, but he had never been abroad on vacation. According to Sergei Alexandrovich, he “is not drawn to all sorts of Thailand and Turkey.”
Sergei is the namesake of former boxer Sergei Mikheev, the wife of ex-skater Irina Slutskaya. Political scientist Sergei Mikheev has nothing to do with Irina.
Sergey Mikheev now
In March 2018, in the program “Evening with Vladimir Solovyov,” the political scientist and the host discussed the consequences for our country of the poisoning incident in the United Kingdom of a former employee of the domestic special services, Sergei Skripal. According to expert forecasts, the West is seeking to “raise the degree of demonization of Russia to the North Korean level.”Sergey Mikheev - The Skripal case and chemical weapons
The famous Russian political scientist Sergei Aleksandrovich Mikheev is a native Muscovite. He was born in May 1967 into an ordinary intelligent family. Many viewers of modern political talk shows are familiar with Sergei Mikheev, a political scientist, journalist and analyst. He can often be seen on various public and private television channels, heard his public speeches on the radio or watched on the Internet. The audience is attracted by his manner of dialogue, his position and the iron logic with which he defends this position.
Date of birth: May 28, 1967
Age: 49 years old
Place of birth: Moscow
Occupation: Russian political scientist
Marital status: Married
Sergei Mikheev about family and career
After graduating from school, Mikheev went to the Izolyator plant. He didn’t stay here long because he was called up for military service. Two years later, after demobilization, Sergei got a job at the Air Force Engineering Academy named after N. E. Zhukovsky. Here the young man worked for 7 years.
In 1994, Sergei Mikheev left the academy due to his admission to Moscow State University. He chose one of the most prestigious and interesting faculties - philosophy. But this choice was not dictated by fashion or prestige, but by a keen interest in science. The young man’s greatest curiosity was connected with political science, to the study of which he devoted especially much time and effort.
In his third year, in 1997, the young political scientist got a part-time job at the University’s Regional Policy Laboratory. In just a year, he managed to prove himself in such a way that he was accepted into the ranks of experts at the Russian Center for Political Current Affairs in Russia. But Mikheev did not stay here long - until 2001. He left the Center due to ideological differences with its director Igor Bunin.
The same year in the career of a political scientist was marked by a real breakthrough to resounding success. Mikheev was accepted as a political expert on the popular website Politkom.Ru. The public interested in politics immediately noticed a bright expert whose assessments were admired for their accuracy, objectivity and emotionality. Sergei Alexandrovich gained a wide circle of admirers.
Since 2004, the political scientist has changed his place of work. He was admitted to the Center for Political Technologies, established under the CIS Department. A year later, Mikheev became deputy general director and significantly expanded the range of his activities.
Read also: 
Soon, the expert and famous political scientist becomes director of the Institute of Caspian Cooperation. The website of this organization is a media aggregator that collects information from various websites dedicated to the region. And Sergei Mikheev becomes an ITAR-TASS expert.
From 2011 to 2013, he worked as director of the Center for Political Conjuncture, where he recently began his expert work.
Persona non grata in Europe
In the fall of the following year, Mikheev, at the initiative of Lithuania, was included in the list of desiderata (undesirable persons) who are prohibited from entering the European Union because of his position on the crisis that occurred in Ukraine. But Sergei Alexandrovich was not at all embarrassed by such punishment. He did not abandon his position and did not change his views. The political scientist believes that the truth is more valuable than a vacation in Rome or Paris.
The biography of Sergei Mikheev also includes his bright performances on various talk shows, where he is often invited. He is a frequent guest on Vladimir Solovyov’s program. And since December 2015, the expert tried his hand as the host of the socio-political program “Iron Logic,” which is broadcast on Vesti-FM radio. At first, Alla Volokhina was his co-host, and later she was replaced by Sergei Korneevsky.
After the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula to Russia, Sergei Mikheev was elected head of the Expert Advisory Council under the Head of the Republic of Crimea.
Today the name of this man is familiar to everyone who is at least somewhat interested in politics. The main reason for Sergei Alexandrovich’s success is his deep awareness of issues of domestic and foreign policy, as well as straightforwardness. Most often, Western and American politicians come under fire from expert criticism. And recently, he has been subjecting the political elite of neighboring Ukraine to sharp obstruction.
The personal life of Sergei Mikheev is completely hidden from prying eyes. He believes that he is not a representative of show business and a pop star. Therefore, he keeps his family affairs a deep secret from the idle public.
The main reason for the success of Sergei Mikheev is his straightforwardness and belief in his own business. All his articles and speeches are filled with an unimaginable charge of energy, which makes you believe all his words.
In addition, he is not afraid to talk about the hottest topics. This position has led to the fact that since 2014, Sergei Mikheev has been a person of non-desiderate for most European countries.
But the country's leading political scientist is not very upset by this state of affairs. He believes that the truth is much more important than the opportunity to spend a vacation in Paris or Rome.
– When in Soviet schools they wrote an essay on the topic “What do you want to become,” it most often turned out to be: polar explorers, firefighters, pilots. Later, the boys dreamed of becoming astronauts. They were our heroes: the Papaninites, Chkalov, Gagarin... We had a dream - to become a hero. Who did you want to be in first grade?
— Like everyone or many at that time, my dreams were the most banal: I wanted to become a pilot. And he partially realized his dream, albeit at a relatively short stage in his life. For eight years he worked at the Air Force Engineering Academy named after N.E. Zhukovsky, and at the same time he was engaged in hang gliding there.
From the highest tribunes they talk about the need to restore the prestige of the worker and educate young people in the spirit of patriotism. How do you see the hero of today?
“His image looks rather pitiful if you look at the role models that the media offers us all every day. Moreover, on the one hand, there is a certain layer of mass media, creative, intellectual and business elites - in a succinct word, the party. Through the efforts of journalists, she is the center of attention; it is her life that is sold to the “rest of the population” as an ideal to follow.
On the other hand, we still don’t know for sure whether these people are heroes in the eyes of all our fellow citizens: I have not seen sociological surveys on this topic. I suspect that they simply do not exist, and I also believe that it is no coincidence. After all, an objective and scrupulous analysis will quickly show: we do not treat many of those who are imposed on us as heroes of our time. This is to put it mildly. Maybe even with contempt...
What we see today is mainly the late Soviet illusion of what life should be like in the West brought to life. Ostensibly like this: not limited by any morality, generally accepted traditions, or even legislation.
Swimming in baths with champagne, no prohibitions - in general, a complete raspberry, which many people dreamed of before the collapse of the USSR, thinking that this was true life in a Western “democratic society”. So they began to build their existence according to their ideas. In Soviet times, the capitalist was portrayed as a cynical and ruthless businessman - this is what many of our fellow citizens, whom journalists admire, have become.
After all, back then, in kitchen conversations, many assured each other: in the West, everything is possible, there you have striptease, brothels, and pornography, how cool! They imagined that “over there,” as they say, they eat life with tablespoons, and today they are realizing this dream. After the collapse of the USSR, all this was “flooded” in our country.
Yes, the Russian hedonism industry is developing according to the laws of the Western genre. Indeed, the heroes of the media in “the most democratic countries in the world” are show business people. This is what the Western matrix looks like, transferred to our Russian soil. However, in addition to this, in America there is a very powerful layer of patriotic propaganda aimed at educating young people. But we decided not to take this part of life there from them.
Whether such a choice of our elite was conscious or unconscious is difficult to say. It is clear that the status of a hero always obliges. So they abandoned the patriotic component - they pretended that it wasn’t there and borrowed the “optional part”. That is, all the components of the unbridled, swine state of a person. In this muddy water it is easier to fish and do your business.
In general, the problem of modern Russia is this: we have taken only the worst from both the Soviet past and the Western model of society into the “new Russia”. Domestic borrowings: bloated bureaucracy, a lot of system management problems. They borrowed from the West that part of life where freedom is unlimited, where it destroys man and society.
- This means that it is very difficult to create an image of the current Russian hero, a kind of Danko, who will lead people to a bright future...
— The current model does not provide for any Dankos or similar heroes. Because this model elevates the material factor, profit, profit, profit - as you like - to the absolute level. Ripping out your heart in order to illuminate the path to happiness is not a profitable business; sacrificing oneself is never profitable. In pre-revolutionary Russia, whose society was based on Orthodoxy and the ideology associated with it, the image of self-sacrifice embedded in the foundations of Christianity was one way or another cultivated. Which, I think, helped solve many problems. For example, in the course of repelling numerous interventions or developing distant territories of the empire. The Soviet model undoubtedly borrowed a lot from this experience - removing religion from it. I personally believe that such a “religion without God” was doomed to a short life in Russian conditions, and became precisely one of the reasons for the ideological crisis. But in any case, the principle of self-sacrifice was one of the cornerstones of Soviet ideology.
The current matrix is radically different from both the Soviet and pre-Soviet ones; no one is talking about any self-sacrifice. All the talk, I repeat, is only about material gain. She is the measure of everything. In fact, nothing like this has ever happened in such a frank and undisguised form before in the history of Russia.
However, if you want to talk about some lofty ideals, you will be offered the standard liberal set: freedom-democracy-the right to vote. Here they are, the walls of the pool in which we must splash around...
We have people who want to dissect not only their own history, but even children’s literature. Dunno has always been one of the favorite children's heroes; Nikolai Nosov even sent him to the moon. As they now sarcastically note on the Internet, the book “fully reveals all the delights of a democratic society. Capitalist scum live on the moon, short people there are evil and insidious, the police are corrupt, the capitalists are cruel.” Time passes, and in the late nineties a cartoon based on this work was released. The main difference from the book is that the actions of monopolists and methods of unfair competition are exposed, and the problem of environmental pollution is raised. But capitalism itself is wonderful. How long will we have to wait until they rewrite the fairy tale “Turnip”, calling grandfather and grandmother heroes of the market economy?
— Yes, the heroes are being replaced for children’s audiences, and this is not about attacking specific fairy tales, but about the destruction of ideals. As a believer, I think this is a global trend. The task is to change the places of good and evil, this is the goal of the devil. Unfortunately, history is heading down this path. But in modern Russia, attempts at substitution are perceived quite sharply, because they destroy the national cultural archetype and turn everything upside down.
We are dealing with a harsh and cruel liberal cosmopolitan attack, its target is Russia, which, according to the plan of the attackers, must once again abandon itself. As for the composition of the attackers, I will turn to Mikhail Bulgakov’s story “The Heart of a Dog.” Remember the group of people who came to Professor Preobrazhensky? They introduce themselves: Shvonder, Vyazemskaya, and these are comrades Pestrukhin and Zharovkin. The main one is Shvonder, he does everything consciously. Vyazemskaya - it’s not clear who, but she thinks a lot about herself, she’s listened to Shvonder a lot and believes every word he says. There are two more idiots from the Russian people, those same comrades Pestrukhin and Zharovkin, who swallowed verbal nonsense, and now are going to ensure the legitimacy and mass character of the “process”.
I would caution against two things. On the one hand, from sincerely thinking that we ourselves are not to blame for all this, but only some small group of the ruling elite is to blame. Unfortunately, that would be too easy. It is precisely this simple formula that some are trying to sell to citizens. But this is self-deception. We ourselves, for the most part, legitimize the current state of affairs; we once longed for it, and then accepted it. Now many are seeing the light, but this is a long process.
And second: all this is not a reason for despondency and pessimism. This is exactly what they want from us. But I hope we don't give them such joy.
Sergei Mikheev is a famous Russian political scientist. Many major publications covering political life in the country and abroad listen to his opinion. And, despite the fact that this man appears in public quite often, he still manages to remain a mystery to his admirers.
So, let's find out who Sergei Mikheev really is. How exactly did he become the leading political commentator in the country, and what sets him apart from other political scientists in Russia.
Sergei Mikheev: biography of his early years
Sergei Aleksandrovich Mikheev was born on May 28, 1967 in Moscow. Here he graduated from school, after which he immediately went to work at a factory. But soon he was taken to serve in the army, where he spent two years of his life - from 1985 to 1987.
Having been demobilized, he returned home and soon got a job at the Zhukovsky Air Force Engineering Academy. Here he stayed until 1994, when he entered Moscow State University. M. V. Lomonosov, to the Faculty of Philosophy. At the same time, he already chose political science as his main direction.
Since 1997, Sergei Mikheev has worked part-time at the Moscow State University Laboratory. A year later, he already became one of the experts at the Center for Political Current Affairs in Russia, which he remained until 2001.
In 1999, Sergei Mikheev was accepted into the ranks of the Center for Political Technologies. But he didn’t manage to work there for a long time, since he and Igor Bunin (the director of the organization) had ideological differences. This led to Sergei deciding to leave this organization.
The arrival of popularity
The year 2001 was decisive for Sergei Mikheev, when he got a job as a political expert on the Politkom.Ru website. It was here that the general public drew attention to his emotional reviews. And soon he acquired a wide circle of admirers.
In 2004, Sergei Mikheev moved to work at the Center for Political Technologies at the CIS Department. And a year later he was entrusted with a position, which allowed Sergei to expand his range of activities.
What is the reason for his success?
Logically speaking, the main reason for Sergei Mikheev’s success is his straightforwardness and belief in his own business. All his articles and speeches are filled with an unimaginable charge of energy, which makes you believe all his words.
In addition, he is not afraid to talk about the hottest topics. He was often criticized by Western governments, US actions, and the conflict with Ukraine. Alas, such a position has led to the fact that since 2014, Sergei Mikheev has been a person of non-desideration for most European countries.
But the country's leading political scientist is not very upset by this state of affairs. He believes that the truth is much more important than the opportunity to spend a vacation in Paris or Rome.
